Keywords: Civil Service, Police, Appointment, Testing, Decision of Civil Service Commission, Findings by commission, Judicial review. Labor, Police, Civil service, Judicial review. Municipal Corporations, Police. Police, Hiring. Public Employment, Police. Administrative Law, Judicial review, Substantial evidence. Practice, Civil, Review of administrative action
The Civil Service Commission ruled correctly in finding that the Boston Police Department had not sufficiently demonstrated that an officer candidate had used illegal narcotics when it relied on a single disputed hair test, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled 6-1 on Oct. 30. [Quoted from Mass Lawyers Weekly on-line headline] – Click here for the full text of the SJC decision.
We thank James Timmins for submitting an amicus brief on behalf of the MMLA.