Jul 18
Keywords: Municipal Corporations, Conservation commission, Bylaws and ordinances. Wetlands Protection Act.
In Cave Corp. v. Conservation Commission of Alttleboro the Appeals Court on July 14 found ” no error of law in the conclusion by the judge that the imposition by the commission of condition number twenty-nine, prohibiting disturbance of land within the wetlands protection zone, was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary or capricious.” See also for discussion of effect of Commission failing to hold hearing timely.  For the full text of the decision, click on: Cave Corporation v Conservation Commission of Attleboro
preload preload preload